Supreme Court Rules Medicaid Can Recoup Against Settlement Funds for Future Medical Payments
July 27, 2022
The Supreme
Court of the United States issued a ruling last week that dictates that a state’s Medicaid agency can recoup funds for benefits paid against an injured party’s settlement award for future medical expenses.
In this case , a Florida student was tragically injured and left in a vegetative state when she was hit by a truck after she stepped off her school bus. Her personal injury suit settled with an $800,000 award, of which roughly $35,000 was designated for past medical expenses. Instead of taking the amount designated for past medical expenses, the state Medicaid agency tried to attach $300,000 of the settlement proceeds.
The Medicaid Act requires states to seek reimbursement from third parties who are liable for a recipient’s medical care. As a result, Florida enacted the Medicaid Third-Party Liability Act, which automatically attaches a lien to settlement proceeds that an injured applicant receives from a case “that necessitated that Medicaid provide medical assistance.” (See Fla. Stat. §§409.910(6)(c), (6)(c)(1), 409.901(7)(a).) Generously, the state’s statute limits recovery to 37.5% of the injured party’s total recovery amount.
The plaintiffs argued that federal statute prohibited a state from attaching settlement funds for future medical expenses. While the Medicaid Act prohibits a Medicaid agency from seeking reimbursement from a recipient’s property, the SCOTUS interpreted 42 U. S. C. §1396k(a)(1)(A) to allow a state Medicaid agency to seek reimbursement for both past and future medical care expenses from a personal injury settlement
In this case , a Florida student was tragically injured and left in a vegetative state when she was hit by a truck after she stepped off her school bus. Her personal injury suit settled with an $800,000 award, of which roughly $35,000 was designated for past medical expenses. Instead of taking the amount designated for past medical expenses, the state Medicaid agency tried to attach $300,000 of the settlement proceeds.
The Medicaid Act requires states to seek reimbursement from third parties who are liable for a recipient’s medical care. As a result, Florida enacted the Medicaid Third-Party Liability Act, which automatically attaches a lien to settlement proceeds that an injured applicant receives from a case “that necessitated that Medicaid provide medical assistance.” (See Fla. Stat. §§409.910(6)(c), (6)(c)(1), 409.901(7)(a).) Generously, the state’s statute limits recovery to 37.5% of the injured party’s total recovery amount.
The plaintiffs argued that federal statute prohibited a state from attaching settlement funds for future medical expenses. While the Medicaid Act prohibits a Medicaid agency from seeking reimbursement from a recipient’s property, the SCOTUS interpreted 42 U. S. C. §1396k(a)(1)(A) to allow a state Medicaid agency to seek reimbursement for both past and future medical care expenses from a personal injury settlement
What next?
If you are plan around a potential need for Medicaid assistance, you can:
- Give us a call at 720-821-7604 to schedule a "Discovery Session" at which we can determine whether our firm would be a good fit for your needs. Or fill out our contact form to have us call you.
- Visit our estate planning page to learn more about how proactively thinking through your estate plan can protect you and your family, minimize hassle, lower the chance of family discord, and minimize or eliminate taxes.
- Learn more by reading our blog or watching our videos .
Wondering if you can use a deceased parent’s debit card to pay their final bills? Learn why doing so can cause legal trouble and how proper estate planning helps.
Think writing a will keeps your estate out of court? Learn why a will does not avoid probate in Colorado and how proper planning protects your family’s legacy.
Learn what documents you need for medical incapacity in Colorado, including medical powers of attorney and living wills. Contact The McKenzie Law Firm, LLC today.
Learn how to choose a successor trustee for your Colorado estate plan. Discover key tips to protect your family and manage assets smoothly in the Denver metro area.
Discover why a residuary clause in a will is essential to protect unlisted assets like homes and retirement accounts from probate court in Colorado.
Discover the essential powers of a successor trustee in Colorado, from managing investments to covering healthcare costs, and how to protect your family's assets.
Wondering what "per stirpes" means in a will or trust? Learn how this legal term divides your estate by family branches to protect your loved ones in Colorado.
Wondering which assets must go through probate in Colorado? Learn how real estate, bank accounts, and investments are handled and how to protect your family.
Discover what per stirpes means in estate planning and how this simple choice protects your children and grandchildren. Learn more from The McKenzie Law Firm.
Discover the difference between per capita and per stirpes in estate planning to ensure your family inheritance is distributed according to your true intentions.