Supreme Court Rules Medicaid Can Recoup Against Settlement Funds for Future Medical Payments
July 27, 2022
The Supreme
Court of the United States issued a ruling last week that dictates that a state’s Medicaid agency can recoup funds for benefits paid against an injured party’s settlement award for future medical expenses.
In this case , a Florida student was tragically injured and left in a vegetative state when she was hit by a truck after she stepped off her school bus. Her personal injury suit settled with an $800,000 award, of which roughly $35,000 was designated for past medical expenses. Instead of taking the amount designated for past medical expenses, the state Medicaid agency tried to attach $300,000 of the settlement proceeds.
The Medicaid Act requires states to seek reimbursement from third parties who are liable for a recipient’s medical care. As a result, Florida enacted the Medicaid Third-Party Liability Act, which automatically attaches a lien to settlement proceeds that an injured applicant receives from a case “that necessitated that Medicaid provide medical assistance.” (See Fla. Stat. §§409.910(6)(c), (6)(c)(1), 409.901(7)(a).) Generously, the state’s statute limits recovery to 37.5% of the injured party’s total recovery amount.
The plaintiffs argued that federal statute prohibited a state from attaching settlement funds for future medical expenses. While the Medicaid Act prohibits a Medicaid agency from seeking reimbursement from a recipient’s property, the SCOTUS interpreted 42 U. S. C. §1396k(a)(1)(A) to allow a state Medicaid agency to seek reimbursement for both past and future medical care expenses from a personal injury settlement
In this case , a Florida student was tragically injured and left in a vegetative state when she was hit by a truck after she stepped off her school bus. Her personal injury suit settled with an $800,000 award, of which roughly $35,000 was designated for past medical expenses. Instead of taking the amount designated for past medical expenses, the state Medicaid agency tried to attach $300,000 of the settlement proceeds.
The Medicaid Act requires states to seek reimbursement from third parties who are liable for a recipient’s medical care. As a result, Florida enacted the Medicaid Third-Party Liability Act, which automatically attaches a lien to settlement proceeds that an injured applicant receives from a case “that necessitated that Medicaid provide medical assistance.” (See Fla. Stat. §§409.910(6)(c), (6)(c)(1), 409.901(7)(a).) Generously, the state’s statute limits recovery to 37.5% of the injured party’s total recovery amount.
The plaintiffs argued that federal statute prohibited a state from attaching settlement funds for future medical expenses. While the Medicaid Act prohibits a Medicaid agency from seeking reimbursement from a recipient’s property, the SCOTUS interpreted 42 U. S. C. §1396k(a)(1)(A) to allow a state Medicaid agency to seek reimbursement for both past and future medical care expenses from a personal injury settlement
What next?
If you are plan around a potential need for Medicaid assistance, you can:
- Give us a call at 720-821-7604 to schedule a "Discovery Session" at which we can determine whether our firm would be a good fit for your needs. Or fill out our contact form to have us call you.
- Visit our estate planning page to learn more about how proactively thinking through your estate plan can protect you and your family, minimize hassle, lower the chance of family discord, and minimize or eliminate taxes.
- Learn more by reading our blog or watching our videos .
Discover what happens to bank accounts after death. Learn the key differences between joint and individual accounts, and how to avoid Colorado probate court.
Wondering why Matthew Perry’s estate ended up in probate court? Discover how to align your assets and avoid common mistakes with a comprehensive estate plan.
Draining your home equity to hide assets from a lawsuit will backfire. Learn why courts reject last-minute loans and how to protect your wealth legally.
Inheriting a family home can spark bitter sibling rivalries. Learn why a property appraisal protects your family from capital gains tax and future conflicts.
Learn how a reverse mortgage can put a non-borrowing spouse at risk of losing their home and how proper estate planning protects your Colorado family.
Wondering if you need different lawyers for estate planning and probate? Learn how a full-service Denver firm protects your family from court.
Confused about estate planning vs. probate? Learn how a comprehensive plan protects your Denver-area family and keeps your assets out of Colorado courts.
Thinking about adding your kids to your property title to avoid probate? Discover the hidden legal and tax risks before you make this costly mistake.
Think probate is only for the rich? In Colorado, individual assets over $90,000 trigger court. Learn how a Centennial estate planning attorney can help.
Thinking about handling a Colorado estate without a lawyer? Learn how DIY probate creates family conflict and why keeping secrets can destroy relationships.