Supreme Court Rules Medicaid Can Recoup Against Settlement Funds for Future Medical Payments
July 27, 2022
The Supreme
Court of the United States issued a ruling last week that dictates that a state’s Medicaid agency can recoup funds for benefits paid against an injured party’s settlement award for future medical expenses.
In this case , a Florida student was tragically injured and left in a vegetative state when she was hit by a truck after she stepped off her school bus. Her personal injury suit settled with an $800,000 award, of which roughly $35,000 was designated for past medical expenses. Instead of taking the amount designated for past medical expenses, the state Medicaid agency tried to attach $300,000 of the settlement proceeds.
The Medicaid Act requires states to seek reimbursement from third parties who are liable for a recipient’s medical care. As a result, Florida enacted the Medicaid Third-Party Liability Act, which automatically attaches a lien to settlement proceeds that an injured applicant receives from a case “that necessitated that Medicaid provide medical assistance.” (See Fla. Stat. §§409.910(6)(c), (6)(c)(1), 409.901(7)(a).) Generously, the state’s statute limits recovery to 37.5% of the injured party’s total recovery amount.
The plaintiffs argued that federal statute prohibited a state from attaching settlement funds for future medical expenses. While the Medicaid Act prohibits a Medicaid agency from seeking reimbursement from a recipient’s property, the SCOTUS interpreted 42 U. S. C. §1396k(a)(1)(A) to allow a state Medicaid agency to seek reimbursement for both past and future medical care expenses from a personal injury settlement
In this case , a Florida student was tragically injured and left in a vegetative state when she was hit by a truck after she stepped off her school bus. Her personal injury suit settled with an $800,000 award, of which roughly $35,000 was designated for past medical expenses. Instead of taking the amount designated for past medical expenses, the state Medicaid agency tried to attach $300,000 of the settlement proceeds.
The Medicaid Act requires states to seek reimbursement from third parties who are liable for a recipient’s medical care. As a result, Florida enacted the Medicaid Third-Party Liability Act, which automatically attaches a lien to settlement proceeds that an injured applicant receives from a case “that necessitated that Medicaid provide medical assistance.” (See Fla. Stat. §§409.910(6)(c), (6)(c)(1), 409.901(7)(a).) Generously, the state’s statute limits recovery to 37.5% of the injured party’s total recovery amount.
The plaintiffs argued that federal statute prohibited a state from attaching settlement funds for future medical expenses. While the Medicaid Act prohibits a Medicaid agency from seeking reimbursement from a recipient’s property, the SCOTUS interpreted 42 U. S. C. §1396k(a)(1)(A) to allow a state Medicaid agency to seek reimbursement for both past and future medical care expenses from a personal injury settlement
What next?
If you are plan around a potential need for Medicaid assistance, you can:
- Give us a call at 720-821-7604 to schedule a "Discovery Session" at which we can determine whether our firm would be a good fit for your needs. Or fill out our contact form to have us call you.
- Visit our estate planning page to learn more about how proactively thinking through your estate plan can protect you and your family, minimize hassle, lower the chance of family discord, and minimize or eliminate taxes.
- Learn more by reading our blog or watching our videos .
Learn why a Power of Attorney is essential in Colorado. The McKenzie Law Firm, LLC helps residents establish financial and medical POAs to protect their wishes and loved ones.
Learn how Colorado handles estates when someone passes away without a will. The McKenzie Law Firm, LLC helps families navigate intestate succession and probate with guidance and care.
Learn the legal grounds for contesting a will in Colorado, including undue influence, fraud, and lack of capacity. The McKenzie Law Firm, LLC helps Colorado families with will contests and probate disputes.
Learn the difference between an executor and a personal representative in Colorado probate law. The McKenzie Law Firm, LLC helps New York clients understand estate administration roles and terminology.
Learn the difference between an executor and a personal representative in Colorado probate law. The McKenzie Law Firm, LLC helps New York clients understand estate administration roles and terminology.
Learn how long estate administration takes in Colorado and what affects the timeline. The McKenzie Law Firm, LLC helps Denver families navigate probate and estate matters efficiently.
Learn the key legal reasons to contest a will in Colorado, including lack of capacity, undue influence, and fraud. The McKenzie Law Firm, LLC helps New York residents navigate estate matters.
Differences Between a Trust and a Will in Colorado
Who Can I Name as an Heir in Colorado?
Consequences of Dying Without a Will in Colorado
What Types of Assets Can Be Included in a Colorado Trust?